为了促进学术交流,SimulWay将推出“基于Agent仿真前沿学术论文翻译系列”,同时方便大家获取仿真币途径。
0 Q( M0 G5 {3 k! m$ q2 ?' o0 S! b3 d6 O; a! a) i$ N2 {3 _
- e! X+ A$ N6 a# `7 i oGroups of Agents with a Leader
: G/ s6 a2 E% Q Journal of Artificial Societies and Social Simulation vol. 10, no. 4 part21 共165字,请翻译。; {. w5 d9 ?! p" i6 \5 r
/ O$ D5 q l, l( S只有通顺正确的翻译才可能赢得悬赏!% [6 z" y9 X# D N% P9 L7 q
# D% e' f0 u& C! k' ?6 O
3 u8 r$ e; P% ?& x9 W
3.16 The results of adding space-dependent communication to groups without a leader are shown in Table 7. | Table 7: Time taken to reach the target by the first and the last individual in groups of 10 and 50 agents without a leader and space-dependent communication | | Group size | First | Last | 10 | 57 (103) | 720 (1184) | 50 | 3 (5) | 56 (10) | | 9 }: }7 b M1 `2 F7 G4 h
3.17 Predictably, space-dependent communication is less effective than space-independent communication. The effect varies as a function of group size. In groups of 50 individuals, there is only a small deterioration in performance compared to groups with space-independent communication. In groups of 10 individuals, however, space-limited communication results in much worse performance. The reason is that with space-dependent communication information takes longer to reach all the individuals in a group. Given an environment of a certain size, individuals in large groups tend to be closer to one another because of their greater density. As a result, the negative effects of space-dependent communication are limited. By contrast, small groups tend to be more dispersed and information takes longer to reach all the individuals in the group. |