为了促进学术交流,SimulWay将推出“基于Agent仿真前沿学术论文翻译系列”,同时方便大家获取仿真币途径。
' C7 N, h/ F; w( W6 K# S7 E" n6 D2 ~8 w% z* Z8 q2 L2 [; w( e
; ]8 q# U; p; g" p4 Z; T4 u t" xGroups of Agents with a Leader
( b9 c+ t# d1 ]$ i' e Journal of Artificial Societies and Social Simulation vol. 10, no. 4 part21 共165字,请翻译。
) e9 _, J. |% w
% F& k V9 F6 i- K/ Y; w7 r只有通顺正确的翻译才可能赢得悬赏!
6 a8 A5 i9 `6 U4 Z& n1 F& {$ R' B F- Z/ O8 s( `
e- j4 J* G3 z1 G9 d+ R6 ]
3.16 The results of adding space-dependent communication to groups without a leader are shown in Table 7. | Table 7: Time taken to reach the target by the first and the last individual in groups of 10 and 50 agents without a leader and space-dependent communication | | Group size | First | Last | 10 | 57 (103) | 720 (1184) | 50 | 3 (5) | 56 (10) | | 1 L1 k$ X! A% }! U) C8 D$ t* n
3.17 Predictably, space-dependent communication is less effective than space-independent communication. The effect varies as a function of group size. In groups of 50 individuals, there is only a small deterioration in performance compared to groups with space-independent communication. In groups of 10 individuals, however, space-limited communication results in much worse performance. The reason is that with space-dependent communication information takes longer to reach all the individuals in a group. Given an environment of a certain size, individuals in large groups tend to be closer to one another because of their greater density. As a result, the negative effects of space-dependent communication are limited. By contrast, small groups tend to be more dispersed and information takes longer to reach all the individuals in the group. |