为了促进学术交流,SimulWay将推出“基于Agent仿真前沿学术论文翻译系列”,同时方便大家获取仿真币途径。
h1 [: W% U% J9 c9 H0 A6 Q7 W3 Z& i8 q& X7 h" Y2 E
! \; c% S: m1 x% O8 A; G
Groups of Agents with a Leader
; P/ I* J% }6 S! H; \2 c* S Journal of Artificial Societies and Social Simulation vol. 10, no. 4 part21 共165字,请翻译。! w+ s9 I5 w8 @1 u
- J$ F" Y* e( }
只有通顺正确的翻译才可能赢得悬赏!
. U* {7 h5 s; z+ R' n: S# t7 q
7 q$ X: A, b. V* f. I$ W y a! }; h: R) [8 ^0 e' W% d# {: S# V
3.16 The results of adding space-dependent communication to groups without a leader are shown in Table 7. | | Table 7: Time taken to reach the target by the first and the last individual in groups of 10 and 50 agents without a leader and space-dependent communication | | | Group size | First | Last | | 10 | 57 (103) | 720 (1184) | | 50 | 3 (5) | 56 (10) | |
5 J, y, C1 _/ n. L" o3.17 Predictably, space-dependent communication is less effective than space-independent communication. The effect varies as a function of group size. In groups of 50 individuals, there is only a small deterioration in performance compared to groups with space-independent communication. In groups of 10 individuals, however, space-limited communication results in much worse performance. The reason is that with space-dependent communication information takes longer to reach all the individuals in a group. Given an environment of a certain size, individuals in large groups tend to be closer to one another because of their greater density. As a result, the negative effects of space-dependent communication are limited. By contrast, small groups tend to be more dispersed and information takes longer to reach all the individuals in the group. |