为了促进学术交流,SimulWay将推出“基于Agent仿真前沿学术论文翻译系列”,同时方便大家获取仿真币途径。
1 q/ l2 o8 l, o
$ t( H: k7 J3 Q7 ]0 I# x, F4 @6 m' r0 w! T9 K P2 s. ^% A/ {
Groups of Agents with a Leader
- V/ v$ ?- \/ D+ S* j- T: m Journal of Artificial Societies and Social Simulation vol. 10, no. 4 part21 共165字,请翻译。+ D# S5 Q# r8 Y! v
( E, ~' U8 C7 N3 j- N只有通顺正确的翻译才可能赢得悬赏!
7 d$ k& A- e k
$ I3 `* i: Y, p6 Q1 k( L1 ?9 k- z6 k* l# I3 T9 L' S$ H& r( }
3.16 The results of adding space-dependent communication to groups without a leader are shown in Table 7. | | Table 7: Time taken to reach the target by the first and the last individual in groups of 10 and 50 agents without a leader and space-dependent communication | | | Group size | First | Last | | 10 | 57 (103) | 720 (1184) | | 50 | 3 (5) | 56 (10) | | 8 a3 l7 t) r7 T" S
3.17 Predictably, space-dependent communication is less effective than space-independent communication. The effect varies as a function of group size. In groups of 50 individuals, there is only a small deterioration in performance compared to groups with space-independent communication. In groups of 10 individuals, however, space-limited communication results in much worse performance. The reason is that with space-dependent communication information takes longer to reach all the individuals in a group. Given an environment of a certain size, individuals in large groups tend to be closer to one another because of their greater density. As a result, the negative effects of space-dependent communication are limited. By contrast, small groups tend to be more dispersed and information takes longer to reach all the individuals in the group. |