为了促进学术交流,SimulWay将推出“基于Agent仿真前沿学术论文翻译系列”,同时方便大家获取仿真币途径。) P8 N# O) Y9 r1 }" A2 ?# f
% U4 K2 d, T8 ]1 O$ Q( ^; Z, E
! ?' {" ]6 q& m7 d( C0 e, D; H
Groups of Agents with a Leader , I" P) i: t0 B: L6 B! e+ r1 c9 u' p
Journal of Artificial Societies and Social Simulation vol. 10, no. 4 part21 共165字,请翻译。
+ \, F& R& a" [, @6 W. i' Y D1 M9 g1 v$ ^. l, s& g; L5 s
只有通顺正确的翻译才可能赢得悬赏!
0 n A+ d6 N/ f Y7 ~( ?- H" f5 T' L
7 r9 Z$ b0 A9 b' L
3.16 The results of adding space-dependent communication to groups without a leader are shown in Table 7. | | Table 7: Time taken to reach the target by the first and the last individual in groups of 10 and 50 agents without a leader and space-dependent communication | | | Group size | First | Last | | 10 | 57 (103) | 720 (1184) | | 50 | 3 (5) | 56 (10) | |
! l+ d6 ]; v- u* ~% J8 q( L2 l V% ]3.17 Predictably, space-dependent communication is less effective than space-independent communication. The effect varies as a function of group size. In groups of 50 individuals, there is only a small deterioration in performance compared to groups with space-independent communication. In groups of 10 individuals, however, space-limited communication results in much worse performance. The reason is that with space-dependent communication information takes longer to reach all the individuals in a group. Given an environment of a certain size, individuals in large groups tend to be closer to one another because of their greater density. As a result, the negative effects of space-dependent communication are limited. By contrast, small groups tend to be more dispersed and information takes longer to reach all the individuals in the group. |