|
Deborah A. Sadowski ,Mark R. Grabau# [, C6 R( k8 x. @
There's a common misconception that performing a simulation study involves a sequence of steps (e.g., project definition, model formulation, verification, validation, analysis). To the contrary, all elements of a simulation project should be performed repeatedly throughout the effort, 2 y& L! q. f2 @) |" [# i
growing in scope as the model progresses.
2 u/ X1 R$ z+ r, sIn the traditional view, projects suffer from too strong a focus on the model (and perhaps the animation), so that after the inevitable delays and problems, there's no time left to run scenarios. Instead, the analyst is faced with a presentation deadline that's firm and little time to experi-+ Q% p0 v0 r3 h
ment, analyze, or think.
, `2 x+ m0 _) y: H Q6 D0 BInstead, you should schedule the project in complete phases. Intermediate milestones, spaced no more than about two weeks apart in a medium to large project, should include specific goals for the model, animation, data, and analysis. By the time you reach the last 25% of your time on the project, you should have addressed the basic analysis issues of run length, warm-up time, etc. and should already have performed preliminary analysis on the model for a number of different scenarios. |
|