|
|
Deborah A. Sadowski ,Mark R. Grabau
& }) R1 w" h; T1 N" o& BThere's a common misconception that performing a simulation study involves a sequence of steps (e.g., project definition, model formulation, verification, validation, analysis). To the contrary, all elements of a simulation project should be performed repeatedly throughout the effort, ) r7 ?+ w1 w/ ]$ m8 g! B
growing in scope as the model progresses.
( w! ?" I: G9 P3 {In the traditional view, projects suffer from too strong a focus on the model (and perhaps the animation), so that after the inevitable delays and problems, there's no time left to run scenarios. Instead, the analyst is faced with a presentation deadline that's firm and little time to experi-; |5 v! y$ D6 x6 c' Y$ V8 }
ment, analyze, or think.
/ {6 V" q; a6 L3 r# d- {Instead, you should schedule the project in complete phases. Intermediate milestones, spaced no more than about two weeks apart in a medium to large project, should include specific goals for the model, animation, data, and analysis. By the time you reach the last 25% of your time on the project, you should have addressed the basic analysis issues of run length, warm-up time, etc. and should already have performed preliminary analysis on the model for a number of different scenarios. |
|