为了促进学术交流,SimulWay将推出“基于Agent仿真前沿学术论文翻译系列”,同时方便大家获取仿真币途径。4 }; v/ |$ W( N, \% F
f" K+ D2 W, G3 O: K9 V! G' f e; i# S. c) Q) P" a5 B
Groups of Agents with a Leader
/ }# z6 Y- ^/ Q+ b" B Journal of Artificial Societies and Social Simulation vol. 10, no. 4 part21 共165字,请翻译。
6 l; B# V& J7 E. J8 y1 y
5 f, W s: r/ G只有通顺正确的翻译才可能赢得悬赏!: _7 ~! E; N- c+ P
0 ~; W% N, l: E' V* n5 X
4 l/ Z9 R& [# M f- w! _" F3.16 The results of adding space-dependent communication to groups without a leader are shown in Table 7. | | Table 7: Time taken to reach the target by the first and the last individual in groups of 10 and 50 agents without a leader and space-dependent communication | | | Group size | First | Last | | 10 | 57 (103) | 720 (1184) | | 50 | 3 (5) | 56 (10) | |
% w# T% S3 j- S) L/ f' p3.17 Predictably, space-dependent communication is less effective than space-independent communication. The effect varies as a function of group size. In groups of 50 individuals, there is only a small deterioration in performance compared to groups with space-independent communication. In groups of 10 individuals, however, space-limited communication results in much worse performance. The reason is that with space-dependent communication information takes longer to reach all the individuals in a group. Given an environment of a certain size, individuals in large groups tend to be closer to one another because of their greater density. As a result, the negative effects of space-dependent communication are limited. By contrast, small groups tend to be more dispersed and information takes longer to reach all the individuals in the group. |