为了促进学术交流,SimulWay将推出“基于Agent仿真前沿学术论文翻译系列”,同时方便大家获取仿真币途径。
: y. r: B1 z7 }- p8 U( Q+ M% J$ B+ ~, Z5 S( _ p
5 T& p2 V) @+ E( \2 W* |
Groups of Agents with a Leader
. ]. o# L2 ~3 k% T9 ?; c( L Journal of Artificial Societies and Social Simulation vol. 10, no. 4 part21 共165字,请翻译。# w& M$ F$ \9 o; u' w/ x2 {$ q
/ S/ I2 R3 s* S ~. b只有通顺正确的翻译才可能赢得悬赏!
# b; L- R E- d, j1 J8 a0 {) a4 w8 V7 v
6 V$ k$ Z& B- v3 T3 b( x0 D3.16 The results of adding space-dependent communication to groups without a leader are shown in Table 7. | Table 7: Time taken to reach the target by the first and the last individual in groups of 10 and 50 agents without a leader and space-dependent communication | | Group size | First | Last | 10 | 57 (103) | 720 (1184) | 50 | 3 (5) | 56 (10) | |
& h. C0 \7 }% N9 T$ f/ j- w# n3.17 Predictably, space-dependent communication is less effective than space-independent communication. The effect varies as a function of group size. In groups of 50 individuals, there is only a small deterioration in performance compared to groups with space-independent communication. In groups of 10 individuals, however, space-limited communication results in much worse performance. The reason is that with space-dependent communication information takes longer to reach all the individuals in a group. Given an environment of a certain size, individuals in large groups tend to be closer to one another because of their greater density. As a result, the negative effects of space-dependent communication are limited. By contrast, small groups tend to be more dispersed and information takes longer to reach all the individuals in the group. |