为了促进学术交流，SimulWay将推出“基于Agent仿真前沿学术论文翻译系列”，同时方便大家获取仿真币途径。
) ~6 c6 k2 y) [, i
" F7 K/ m5 `- k: @( a! }$ \
: k: j8 J4 f: r0 K. OGroups of Agents with a Leader
8 B9 z; u# Y* {) H; A, d* p* X6 v Journal of Artificial Societies and Social Simulation vol. 10, no. 4 part21 共165字，请翻译。, _& p' ~, M8 v4 r4 }
) a8 o! S7 w( [ G% l8 `6 {只有通顺正确的翻译才可能赢得悬赏！# c) u7 j. Y L. A% }
' x, A D4 y/ e( d# ]/ p; i% r
& V1 K1 C+ i7 i, j3.16 The results of adding space-dependent communication to groups without a leader are shown in Table 7. | | Table 7: Time taken to reach the target by the first and the last individual in groups of 10 and 50 agents without a leader and space-dependent communication | | | Group size | First | Last | | 10 | 57 (103) | 720 (1184) | | 50 | 3 (5) | 56 (10) | |
$ W9 _. \7 G1 i: n% j7 [. I% ]3.17 Predictably, space-dependent communication is less effective than space-independent communication. The effect varies as a function of group size. In groups of 50 individuals, there is only a small deterioration in performance compared to groups with space-independent communication. In groups of 10 individuals, however, space-limited communication results in much worse performance. The reason is that with space-dependent communication information takes longer to reach all the individuals in a group. Given an environment of a certain size, individuals in large groups tend to be closer to one another because of their greater density. As a result, the negative effects of space-dependent communication are limited. By contrast, small groups tend to be more dispersed and information takes longer to reach all the individuals in the group. | 
发表于 2007-11-28 17:37:49
