为了促进学术交流,SimulWay将推出“基于Agent仿真前沿学术论文翻译系列”,同时方便大家获取仿真币途径。
9 a8 N2 @8 V9 r0 ?# q, X& h, K+ L
1 e+ \1 h' w2 G/ y5 B1 M9 x5 m7 m
Groups of Agents with a Leader
7 z; E9 T& ?8 g ~' {$ U2 L Journal of Artificial Societies and Social Simulation vol. 10, no. 4 part21 共165字,请翻译。
# [. Z( {# C3 u' q4 c/ A. [& C+ f0 q" K* Z# @" z* F
只有通顺正确的翻译才可能赢得悬赏!& C0 d. f, e7 q+ m: [- A) ]
- P, S9 @/ y* M8 s, ]6 Y& Y8 Y
, Q; g# E7 T2 R- J( t/ ^3.16 The results of adding space-dependent communication to groups without a leader are shown in Table 7. | | Table 7: Time taken to reach the target by the first and the last individual in groups of 10 and 50 agents without a leader and space-dependent communication | | | Group size | First | Last | | 10 | 57 (103) | 720 (1184) | | 50 | 3 (5) | 56 (10) | |
( G. n# v3 E' u( x, c5 O; r/ G3.17 Predictably, space-dependent communication is less effective than space-independent communication. The effect varies as a function of group size. In groups of 50 individuals, there is only a small deterioration in performance compared to groups with space-independent communication. In groups of 10 individuals, however, space-limited communication results in much worse performance. The reason is that with space-dependent communication information takes longer to reach all the individuals in a group. Given an environment of a certain size, individuals in large groups tend to be closer to one another because of their greater density. As a result, the negative effects of space-dependent communication are limited. By contrast, small groups tend to be more dispersed and information takes longer to reach all the individuals in the group. |