为了促进学术交流,SimulWay将推出“基于Agent仿真前沿学术论文翻译系列”,同时方便大家获取仿真币途径。
( y& w$ d6 O/ g4 t2 t8 M: U+ M7 m- ~. ~- z2 g
9 ^- Y8 m: q& ^5 E1 H
Groups of Agents with a Leader
$ t5 o$ R" T6 V" J Journal of Artificial Societies and Social Simulation vol. 10, no. 4 part21 共165字,请翻译。
7 [8 E* I# \& z6 o+ ]+ Y1 X! d- x* R5 m2 Z) {1 t" \1 Y- [( J
只有通顺正确的翻译才可能赢得悬赏!% D5 F$ ]8 ]9 a, q! Y( P4 r
" @" B9 P* V: O
0 m" g; `0 A0 F0 r0 y: h3.16 The results of adding space-dependent communication to groups without a leader are shown in Table 7. | | Table 7: Time taken to reach the target by the first and the last individual in groups of 10 and 50 agents without a leader and space-dependent communication | | | Group size | First | Last | | 10 | 57 (103) | 720 (1184) | | 50 | 3 (5) | 56 (10) | |
2 q+ E8 u6 {$ T' @# e3 ?3.17 Predictably, space-dependent communication is less effective than space-independent communication. The effect varies as a function of group size. In groups of 50 individuals, there is only a small deterioration in performance compared to groups with space-independent communication. In groups of 10 individuals, however, space-limited communication results in much worse performance. The reason is that with space-dependent communication information takes longer to reach all the individuals in a group. Given an environment of a certain size, individuals in large groups tend to be closer to one another because of their greater density. As a result, the negative effects of space-dependent communication are limited. By contrast, small groups tend to be more dispersed and information takes longer to reach all the individuals in the group. |