为了促进学术交流,SimulWay将推出“基于Agent仿真前沿学术论文翻译系列”,同时方便大家获取仿真币途径。) Y& Y3 p" ^) X+ R: S2 t& r, l* ?
2 P; @5 k% W: S, Q3 R9 q) s+ L* ^) J
) F0 l7 T3 m( v1 u' @
Groups of Agents with a Leader
& X; ~' `/ {% P! X- e5 w Journal of Artificial Societies and Social Simulation vol. 10, no. 4 part21 共165字,请翻译。6 F8 f4 r, S# I( i! \
0 h' G0 F6 [2 o. c1 h
只有通顺正确的翻译才可能赢得悬赏!
: v" j& o3 l$ w1 X! a
" Q' |( q) d8 ^3 a' x
1 `, @1 W( {2 j4 P0 r9 Q, [1 s3.16 The results of adding space-dependent communication to groups without a leader are shown in Table 7. | | Table 7: Time taken to reach the target by the first and the last individual in groups of 10 and 50 agents without a leader and space-dependent communication | | | Group size | First | Last | | 10 | 57 (103) | 720 (1184) | | 50 | 3 (5) | 56 (10) | |
) B% Z5 I+ {$ b' R8 t3.17 Predictably, space-dependent communication is less effective than space-independent communication. The effect varies as a function of group size. In groups of 50 individuals, there is only a small deterioration in performance compared to groups with space-independent communication. In groups of 10 individuals, however, space-limited communication results in much worse performance. The reason is that with space-dependent communication information takes longer to reach all the individuals in a group. Given an environment of a certain size, individuals in large groups tend to be closer to one another because of their greater density. As a result, the negative effects of space-dependent communication are limited. By contrast, small groups tend to be more dispersed and information takes longer to reach all the individuals in the group. |