为了促进学术交流,SimulWay将推出“基于Agent仿真前沿学术论文翻译系列”,同时方便大家获取仿真币途径。* c6 B$ n* r" F9 W$ I
) H" C0 {4 I# \! J+ r e1 y
$ p$ d7 X. _# \3 @) p% T7 r0 T
Groups of Agents with a Leader ) |$ @+ l9 U6 Y& i/ t
Journal of Artificial Societies and Social Simulation vol. 10, no. 4 part21 共165字,请翻译。, i8 l/ a1 T9 M$ t, r0 z' I
3 f' G: l; v7 @. e- A7 `
只有通顺正确的翻译才可能赢得悬赏!
& E) {, [5 E( s7 @: i& S+ l, W% g9 m6 v4 p: C, P/ G
5 j% J* N: V: n, x5 x5 `1 P7 ~
3.16 The results of adding space-dependent communication to groups without a leader are shown in Table 7. | | Table 7: Time taken to reach the target by the first and the last individual in groups of 10 and 50 agents without a leader and space-dependent communication | | | Group size | First | Last | | 10 | 57 (103) | 720 (1184) | | 50 | 3 (5) | 56 (10) | |
; {: C* m$ R H# g. F4 e3.17 Predictably, space-dependent communication is less effective than space-independent communication. The effect varies as a function of group size. In groups of 50 individuals, there is only a small deterioration in performance compared to groups with space-independent communication. In groups of 10 individuals, however, space-limited communication results in much worse performance. The reason is that with space-dependent communication information takes longer to reach all the individuals in a group. Given an environment of a certain size, individuals in large groups tend to be closer to one another because of their greater density. As a result, the negative effects of space-dependent communication are limited. By contrast, small groups tend to be more dispersed and information takes longer to reach all the individuals in the group. |