为了促进学术交流,SimulWay将推出“基于Agent仿真前沿学术论文翻译系列”,同时方便大家获取仿真币途径。9 A# U" G8 i5 U. \: X
2 u g5 m& m2 a
c: K2 x6 B$ |. K7 ]6 Z( eGroups of Agents with a Leader 5 }( p9 B# b3 U9 Y7 R
Journal of Artificial Societies and Social Simulation vol. 10, no. 4 part21 共165字,请翻译。
$ S; U }) {" K/ j* c9 t# C2 D9 ~: X$ |* p& P
只有通顺正确的翻译才可能赢得悬赏!% b% v) m: t, M, |+ L
2 l- ~& r5 q( R& ~) s8 o% f+ k. ]+ j6 n) L0 I a& [$ S ~7 u+ |
3.16 The results of adding space-dependent communication to groups without a leader are shown in Table 7. | | Table 7: Time taken to reach the target by the first and the last individual in groups of 10 and 50 agents without a leader and space-dependent communication | | | Group size | First | Last | | 10 | 57 (103) | 720 (1184) | | 50 | 3 (5) | 56 (10) | | + Q+ s" D8 l5 h8 p1 _
3.17 Predictably, space-dependent communication is less effective than space-independent communication. The effect varies as a function of group size. In groups of 50 individuals, there is only a small deterioration in performance compared to groups with space-independent communication. In groups of 10 individuals, however, space-limited communication results in much worse performance. The reason is that with space-dependent communication information takes longer to reach all the individuals in a group. Given an environment of a certain size, individuals in large groups tend to be closer to one another because of their greater density. As a result, the negative effects of space-dependent communication are limited. By contrast, small groups tend to be more dispersed and information takes longer to reach all the individuals in the group. |