为了促进学术交流,SimulWay将推出“基于Agent仿真前沿学术论文翻译系列”,同时方便大家获取仿真币途径。
/ ?" i9 p& }. Z1 t1 @9 [1 b% {
6 S9 h$ n* |& x/ x' q9 x
) E: L4 `& @6 \: p- Z, y& QGroups of Agents with a Leader & a3 i8 V/ \* l8 R4 s
Journal of Artificial Societies and Social Simulation vol. 10, no. 4 part21 共165字,请翻译。, F$ f# v9 C/ Q3 ? J* y$ [" e
# p8 `& k9 c: K# @5 Y% {
只有通顺正确的翻译才可能赢得悬赏!
% ^2 o7 ^0 M) m$ {9 `! Q- D
2 F9 m e2 h; w; V2 }5 ^& J- \: ?, R2 s2 R! @
3.16 The results of adding space-dependent communication to groups without a leader are shown in Table 7. | Table 7: Time taken to reach the target by the first and the last individual in groups of 10 and 50 agents without a leader and space-dependent communication | | Group size | First | Last | 10 | 57 (103) | 720 (1184) | 50 | 3 (5) | 56 (10) | | 3 Q' w L. h) O! O' j0 V0 ~4 }* ]' Z9 X/ @
3.17 Predictably, space-dependent communication is less effective than space-independent communication. The effect varies as a function of group size. In groups of 50 individuals, there is only a small deterioration in performance compared to groups with space-independent communication. In groups of 10 individuals, however, space-limited communication results in much worse performance. The reason is that with space-dependent communication information takes longer to reach all the individuals in a group. Given an environment of a certain size, individuals in large groups tend to be closer to one another because of their greater density. As a result, the negative effects of space-dependent communication are limited. By contrast, small groups tend to be more dispersed and information takes longer to reach all the individuals in the group. |