为了促进学术交流,SimulWay将推出“基于Agent仿真前沿学术论文翻译系列”,同时方便大家获取仿真币途径。
3 x7 \$ L6 u+ c- d; H- Y& \ X3 p
/ Y& T; `" M- t# \
Groups of Agents with a Leader
& r, f' E: q& X4 z% I Journal of Artificial Societies and Social Simulation vol. 10, no. 4 part21 共165字,请翻译。) K# o# a/ n/ L8 u P/ k3 D& Z0 z, J
* E3 C( q, p- `, P) v7 y
只有通顺正确的翻译才可能赢得悬赏!* p q9 k* U5 }& \* U
5 D. L. M# v/ h# r) u" I# K! i5 {+ `$ @9 p; ]: |4 e9 r
3.16 The results of adding space-dependent communication to groups without a leader are shown in Table 7. | | Table 7: Time taken to reach the target by the first and the last individual in groups of 10 and 50 agents without a leader and space-dependent communication | | | Group size | First | Last | | 10 | 57 (103) | 720 (1184) | | 50 | 3 (5) | 56 (10) | | * a8 g9 x) V6 v. T
3.17 Predictably, space-dependent communication is less effective than space-independent communication. The effect varies as a function of group size. In groups of 50 individuals, there is only a small deterioration in performance compared to groups with space-independent communication. In groups of 10 individuals, however, space-limited communication results in much worse performance. The reason is that with space-dependent communication information takes longer to reach all the individuals in a group. Given an environment of a certain size, individuals in large groups tend to be closer to one another because of their greater density. As a result, the negative effects of space-dependent communication are limited. By contrast, small groups tend to be more dispersed and information takes longer to reach all the individuals in the group. |