为了促进学术交流,SimulWay将推出“基于Agent仿真前沿学术论文翻译系列”,同时方便大家获取仿真币途径。
5 k3 j8 |8 k* ^- B' J: B" Q5 K# s, n6 ~6 l6 E6 u. e4 Q' _( E
: v- h0 T3 y- A7 J9 i, \& WGroups of Agents with a Leader 6 }7 F0 L8 Z+ Z) T2 z+ H
Journal of Artificial Societies and Social Simulation vol. 10, no. 4 part21 共165字,请翻译。
( X( ]% D: x( P1 ]! Q1 Y1 O. ?. |( j& [5 ^7 g
只有通顺正确的翻译才可能赢得悬赏!
4 E! J, p% b2 @6 Y6 D! Y
* |0 U8 z& G% O, p- F$ ?# Z5 E& \$ D9 Z4 `- B2 ~
3.16 The results of adding space-dependent communication to groups without a leader are shown in Table 7. | | Table 7: Time taken to reach the target by the first and the last individual in groups of 10 and 50 agents without a leader and space-dependent communication | | | Group size | First | Last | | 10 | 57 (103) | 720 (1184) | | 50 | 3 (5) | 56 (10) | |
+ J2 t( a9 Z" `- a$ |3.17 Predictably, space-dependent communication is less effective than space-independent communication. The effect varies as a function of group size. In groups of 50 individuals, there is only a small deterioration in performance compared to groups with space-independent communication. In groups of 10 individuals, however, space-limited communication results in much worse performance. The reason is that with space-dependent communication information takes longer to reach all the individuals in a group. Given an environment of a certain size, individuals in large groups tend to be closer to one another because of their greater density. As a result, the negative effects of space-dependent communication are limited. By contrast, small groups tend to be more dispersed and information takes longer to reach all the individuals in the group. |