为了促进学术交流,SimulWay将推出“基于Agent仿真前沿学术论文翻译系列”,同时方便大家获取仿真币途径。
% h2 E; e. p( {; m' D3 i
1 i( u: J/ R/ t9 T/ r7 y
6 o1 W& r- b: J0 Z) o$ V1 P) pGroups of Agents with a Leader " \9 L; Z1 [" Q5 w( M
Journal of Artificial Societies and Social Simulation vol. 10, no. 4 part21 共165字,请翻译。
, r( j3 \ S5 W* o" S; I6 H0 A% v( f* s4 K, L
只有通顺正确的翻译才可能赢得悬赏!( J. X! X7 S& E
9 U0 G N u- K5 S7 |0 a
# N' y. {- L% D" q% Y( i3.16 The results of adding space-dependent communication to groups without a leader are shown in Table 7. | Table 7: Time taken to reach the target by the first and the last individual in groups of 10 and 50 agents without a leader and space-dependent communication | | Group size | First | Last | 10 | 57 (103) | 720 (1184) | 50 | 3 (5) | 56 (10) | |
8 C( @' q& Z# I" O. c& L3.17 Predictably, space-dependent communication is less effective than space-independent communication. The effect varies as a function of group size. In groups of 50 individuals, there is only a small deterioration in performance compared to groups with space-independent communication. In groups of 10 individuals, however, space-limited communication results in much worse performance. The reason is that with space-dependent communication information takes longer to reach all the individuals in a group. Given an environment of a certain size, individuals in large groups tend to be closer to one another because of their greater density. As a result, the negative effects of space-dependent communication are limited. By contrast, small groups tend to be more dispersed and information takes longer to reach all the individuals in the group. |