为了促进学术交流,SimulWay将推出“基于Agent仿真前沿学术论文翻译系列”,同时方便大家获取仿真币途径。( y4 x3 n) k3 m: Y; A
" p' N3 h/ R. i% C# h
" C6 Y, w# i) b* \ Z" SGroups of Agents with a Leader
2 I3 n4 |2 Z8 K5 s( v! C Journal of Artificial Societies and Social Simulation vol. 10, no. 4 part21 共165字,请翻译。
/ F3 y# A0 B/ @7 ^: A: {3 e1 s
4 Z+ A2 u4 O( g4 p0 Y5 E _; v只有通顺正确的翻译才可能赢得悬赏!
, E( |9 I# W2 Q1 M, K6 `! Y
- u. R# b/ o8 X K
8 O, |2 H( }1 f7 R% @4 l7 ^3.16 The results of adding space-dependent communication to groups without a leader are shown in Table 7. | | Table 7: Time taken to reach the target by the first and the last individual in groups of 10 and 50 agents without a leader and space-dependent communication | | | Group size | First | Last | | 10 | 57 (103) | 720 (1184) | | 50 | 3 (5) | 56 (10) | |
4 c+ O- c% a6 }- }2 j3.17 Predictably, space-dependent communication is less effective than space-independent communication. The effect varies as a function of group size. In groups of 50 individuals, there is only a small deterioration in performance compared to groups with space-independent communication. In groups of 10 individuals, however, space-limited communication results in much worse performance. The reason is that with space-dependent communication information takes longer to reach all the individuals in a group. Given an environment of a certain size, individuals in large groups tend to be closer to one another because of their greater density. As a result, the negative effects of space-dependent communication are limited. By contrast, small groups tend to be more dispersed and information takes longer to reach all the individuals in the group. |