为了促进学术交流,SimulWay将推出“基于Agent仿真前沿学术论文翻译系列”,同时方便大家获取仿真币途径。
8 v7 Y7 o: Q7 Z. L1 ]6 }# E1 Y! t
' S; Z9 A0 ~. h0 H, I9 b
% p; H* x' X0 u: }/ _$ `7 @% @Groups of Agents with a Leader : \. n! R+ G' e6 n1 I
Journal of Artificial Societies and Social Simulation vol. 10, no. 4 part21 共165字,请翻译。
1 g+ \. C* W' M& ^6 O) w) ]& Z, i+ r( |. q: n
只有通顺正确的翻译才可能赢得悬赏!
9 A+ \+ z2 x0 [+ S6 s6 F7 x' q$ M' U, f5 s1 u7 Q: s- F
/ {/ i2 H+ ?' @# T5 c
3.16 The results of adding space-dependent communication to groups without a leader are shown in Table 7. | | Table 7: Time taken to reach the target by the first and the last individual in groups of 10 and 50 agents without a leader and space-dependent communication | | | Group size | First | Last | | 10 | 57 (103) | 720 (1184) | | 50 | 3 (5) | 56 (10) | |
: D5 |! U# I) C& f+ j3.17 Predictably, space-dependent communication is less effective than space-independent communication. The effect varies as a function of group size. In groups of 50 individuals, there is only a small deterioration in performance compared to groups with space-independent communication. In groups of 10 individuals, however, space-limited communication results in much worse performance. The reason is that with space-dependent communication information takes longer to reach all the individuals in a group. Given an environment of a certain size, individuals in large groups tend to be closer to one another because of their greater density. As a result, the negative effects of space-dependent communication are limited. By contrast, small groups tend to be more dispersed and information takes longer to reach all the individuals in the group. |