为了促进学术交流,SimulWay将推出“基于Agent仿真前沿学术论文翻译系列”,同时方便大家获取仿真币途径。0 }# J( D1 i! ]# Z. M
$ c* y( _0 e3 I% q5 l. d
" G; L/ o0 C$ \( k T2 N3 P( BGroups of Agents with a Leader / M3 P+ q1 q4 Q* x6 T7 {
Journal of Artificial Societies and Social Simulation vol. 10, no. 4 part21 共165字,请翻译。* k- @; d9 j! o7 g+ k/ p
$ h! V4 P5 W# Y( |2 u! F" v
只有通顺正确的翻译才可能赢得悬赏!1 g/ }$ h( _4 q- w6 C1 q; x2 P
0 L8 o) M. m; F" u: M6 X5 q6 \
( `, m' b' }8 }8 h5 I/ G5 c3.16 The results of adding space-dependent communication to groups without a leader are shown in Table 7. | | Table 7: Time taken to reach the target by the first and the last individual in groups of 10 and 50 agents without a leader and space-dependent communication | | | Group size | First | Last | | 10 | 57 (103) | 720 (1184) | | 50 | 3 (5) | 56 (10) | |
9 j# u0 O# P; q0 [3.17 Predictably, space-dependent communication is less effective than space-independent communication. The effect varies as a function of group size. In groups of 50 individuals, there is only a small deterioration in performance compared to groups with space-independent communication. In groups of 10 individuals, however, space-limited communication results in much worse performance. The reason is that with space-dependent communication information takes longer to reach all the individuals in a group. Given an environment of a certain size, individuals in large groups tend to be closer to one another because of their greater density. As a result, the negative effects of space-dependent communication are limited. By contrast, small groups tend to be more dispersed and information takes longer to reach all the individuals in the group. |