为了促进学术交流,SimulWay将推出“基于Agent仿真前沿学术论文翻译系列”,同时方便大家获取仿真币途径。4 Y+ J- R( k u7 O3 V1 H7 N+ |5 I! V/ {
& ?4 f2 u, V% M: O& z
& f! O( R" ?* g) [. i, M; B/ c. pGroups of Agents with a Leader
! I' `& i# b6 ~5 n ? Journal of Artificial Societies and Social Simulation vol. 10, no. 4 part21 共165字,请翻译。
W" M3 y9 N% l; f7 h% H+ V
4 v6 Q& S4 u, `$ \ m只有通顺正确的翻译才可能赢得悬赏!( H7 R4 h" m" x& s% P! D
# z5 l7 e. [0 m
: L0 i, l( c$ h# N; k) K: r3.16 The results of adding space-dependent communication to groups without a leader are shown in Table 7. | | Table 7: Time taken to reach the target by the first and the last individual in groups of 10 and 50 agents without a leader and space-dependent communication | | | Group size | First | Last | | 10 | 57 (103) | 720 (1184) | | 50 | 3 (5) | 56 (10) | |
$ F( U5 s- B G! Y% c; y; \/ O3.17 Predictably, space-dependent communication is less effective than space-independent communication. The effect varies as a function of group size. In groups of 50 individuals, there is only a small deterioration in performance compared to groups with space-independent communication. In groups of 10 individuals, however, space-limited communication results in much worse performance. The reason is that with space-dependent communication information takes longer to reach all the individuals in a group. Given an environment of a certain size, individuals in large groups tend to be closer to one another because of their greater density. As a result, the negative effects of space-dependent communication are limited. By contrast, small groups tend to be more dispersed and information takes longer to reach all the individuals in the group. |