为了促进学术交流,SimulWay将推出“基于Agent仿真前沿学术论文翻译系列”,同时方便大家获取仿真币途径。0 S# p" Z' `! [
8 z( `1 v. `1 v; U g7 D; B: {$ e* g8 c# Y" e" M' N7 r# |" ?
Groups of Agents with a Leader G& O1 h9 w7 u0 e' v
Journal of Artificial Societies and Social Simulation vol. 10, no. 4 part21 共165字,请翻译。+ s) V& f- r. r, ?0 \
- S3 ^/ Z! |( H& W9 N3 K' ~* u
只有通顺正确的翻译才可能赢得悬赏!
7 I5 f7 e% _% ]0 g4 ]1 ?
3 I+ z, u% {# t( p7 K4 I6 |& N* \6 ?5 r- M( ?# v
3.16 The results of adding space-dependent communication to groups without a leader are shown in Table 7. | | Table 7: Time taken to reach the target by the first and the last individual in groups of 10 and 50 agents without a leader and space-dependent communication | | | Group size | First | Last | | 10 | 57 (103) | 720 (1184) | | 50 | 3 (5) | 56 (10) | | 7 l* L- h. V( E: @4 `+ e# ?
3.17 Predictably, space-dependent communication is less effective than space-independent communication. The effect varies as a function of group size. In groups of 50 individuals, there is only a small deterioration in performance compared to groups with space-independent communication. In groups of 10 individuals, however, space-limited communication results in much worse performance. The reason is that with space-dependent communication information takes longer to reach all the individuals in a group. Given an environment of a certain size, individuals in large groups tend to be closer to one another because of their greater density. As a result, the negative effects of space-dependent communication are limited. By contrast, small groups tend to be more dispersed and information takes longer to reach all the individuals in the group. |